Bard PowerPort Catheters

DID YOU OR A LOVED ONE SUFFER INJURIES FROM A DEFECTIVE BARD POWERPORT CATHETER?

You May Qualify For Settlement Compensation.

Bard PowerPort settlements are being pursued for individuals who received a Bard PowerPort totally implantable vascular access device (TIVAD) and experienced complications or injuries.

Some Bard PowerPort catheters have known defects.

The design defects of the Bard PowerPort catheters have been linked to a growing number of serious injuries and fracturing events, in which small fragments of the catheter broke free in the patient’s vascular system, leading to fatalities, infections, blood clots and emergency surgical procedures to retrieve the fragments. Ongoing lawsuits claim that life-threatening injuries could have been avoided if a safer design had been used, or if the manufacturer had issued a recall in order to warn patients and doctors.

Compensation Form

See If You Qualify For Compensation

How Do I Get Compensated?

Fill Out The Form

Fill in the form to see if you qualify.

Speak With Our Specialists

We'll review your submission quickly and then follow up with you.

Potential Compensation

Receive the justice and potential compensation that you and your loved ones deserve.

Untitled design (22)
Who Qualifies For A Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?
 

Financial compensation through a Bard PowerPort lawsuit settlement may be available for individuals who had a Bard PowerPort implanted, and experienced any of the following injuries or conditions;

  • Perforations of tissues, vessels and organs
  • Infections (sepsis or septic shock)
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
  • Hemorrhaging or Bleeding Injuries
  • Fluid buildup on the heart
  • Irregular Heartbeat
  • Severe and persistent pain
  • Wrongful death
  • Other injuries caused by fractured PowerPort catheter

What models are included in the Bard Implantable Port Lawsuit?

  • Bard PowerPort
  • Bard Powerflow™
  • Bard X‑Port™
  • Bard SlimPort

  • Bard MRI Ports
  • Bard Groshong Catheter
  • Bard Titanium Port
  • Bard Vaccess CTM

field of expertise

Lawsuits And Legal Process

As the adverse health effects of the water contamination surfaced, affected individuals and families initiated legal proceedings to pursue justice and compensation for their hardships. Numerous lawsuits were filed against the U.S. government, alleging negligence, failure to provide adequate warning, and other grievances. 

Legal Process Key Steps

 The plaintiffs (those affected) engage legal representation and file lawsuits against the parties responsible for the water contamination.

Both sides gather evidence through the discovery process, which involves obtaining records, conducting depositions, and gathering experts’ opinions.hile some cases can be settled quickly, others may take longer, particularly if they require legal action.

 Depending on the strength of the evidence and negotiation process, some cases may reach an out-of-court settlement. If a settlement cannot be reached, the case proceeds to trial.

In a trial, evidence is presented, witnesses testify, and legal arguments are made. A judge or jury decides on the verdict, determining if the defendant(s) were liable and whether damages should be awarded to the plaintiffs.

If You Were A Victim Of Camp Lejeune Water Contamination, We Can Help

Have A Lawyer will match you with a qualified attorney who can evaluate your case and help you seek justice and compensation for the injuries you’ve experienced from exposure to contamination. If you believe you have a case, please contact us so we can guide you to the best possible outcome. FIND OUT NOW if you qualify for compensation. Fill out the easy form above and get an immediate and FREE case review!

Mass Tort vs. Class Action

What Are the Differences Between Mass Tort And Class Action Lawsuits?

STRUCTURE

1.Mass Tort: Consists of several individual lawsuits grouped together based on common case details or defendants.
2.Class Action Lawsuit: A single lawsuit developed for a larger group--the "class"--who are represented by a single plaintiff.

INDIVIDUAL CONTROL

1.Mass Tort: Each individual plaintiff has control over their case and its resolution.
2.Class Action Lawsuit: Members of the class have limited control over the lawsuit, as case decisions are made by the single representative plaintiff and their legal team

COMPENSATION

1.Mass Tort: Compensation and settlements are determined case by case, in consideration each plaintiff's unique circumstances and harm suffered.
2.Class Action Lawsuits: Compensation and settlements are typically distributed evenly among all class members, often based on a pro-rata structure.

APPLICABILITY

1.Mass Tort: Best for situations when each plaintiff's case is distinguished by different degrees of harm or other circumstances.
2.Class Action Lawsuits: Ideal when the members of the class all share similar claims and a uniform resolution is fair or reasonable.

EFFICIENCY

1.Mass Tort: Can be more time-consuming and complex since each case may require individual management.
2.Class Action Lawsuits: Generally more efficient as terms, negotiations, and resolutions apply more equally to all claimants.

Recognizing these distinctions is essential for both plaintiffs and defendants when deciding on the most suitable legal approach for addressing a shared complaint or injury.