Jki-facebook-light Jki-linkedin-light
Book a Strategy Call

PFAS Contamination Lawsuit

  • Home
  • PFAS Contamination Lawsuit

DID YOU UNDERGO BASIC MILITARY TRAINING?

You May Have Been Exposed To PFAS Through Firefoam (AFFF) During Training.

Hundreds of military sites have been found to have PFAS contamination in their drinking water or groundwater, typically from the use of firefoam. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to PFAS through Firefoam (AFFF), you may qualify for SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL COMPENSATION.

LAWSUIT WILL NOT AFFECT YOUR ELIGIBILITY TO COLLECT VA DISABILITY BENEFITS.
Compensation Form

See If You Qualify For Compensation

How Do I Get Compensated?

Fill Out The Form

Fill in the form to see if you qualify.

Speak With Our Specialists

We'll review your submission quickly and then follow up with you.

Potential Compensation

Receive the justice and potential compensation that you and your loved ones deserve.

Untitled design (27)
Forever Chemicals: Health Crisis And Legal Battle

PFAS: An Explainer

PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are artificial chemicals that have been used since the 1950s in a wide variety of products, including non-stick cookware, stain-resistant fabrics, some food packaging, and firefighting foam.

The Problem With PFAs

These chemicals do not break down easily in the environment or in the human body, and they can accumulate over time, which can increase the risk of cancer, weaken the immune system, disrupt hormonal balance, and harm the reproductive and developmental systems.

You might be entitled to compensation for suffering. Find out if you qualify for compensation by completing the form above and get access to an immediate and FREE case evaluation!

The Link Between PFAs and Firefighting Foam

Aqueous Film-Forming Foam, or AFFF, is a chemical fire-suppressant used to extinguish flammable liquid fires. This foam uses PFAS, toxic “forever chemicals” that persist in and out of the bodyfor an extended period of time. AFFF is commonly used by Firefighters, Emergency Responders, Military Personnel, and Airport Workers
Common Diagnoses After Exposure:
  • Kidney cancer
  • Bladder cancer
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Liver Cancer
  • Breast Cancer
  • Leukemia (and other blood cancers)
  • Prostate cancer
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Testicular cancer
  • Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
  • Thyroid diseases
  • Thyroid Cancer

  • The first firefighting foam injury lawsuits involving kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, liver cancer and thyroid cancer are being prepared for early trials to help gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the AFFF litigation.
  • Firefighting foam lawyers are still investigating and pursuing new AFFF lawsuits for firefighters diagnosed with testicular cancer, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, liver cancer, bladder cancer, thyroid cancer and thyroid disease following exposure to PFAS chemicals in AFFF products.

As of 2024, nearly 7,000 AFFF foam lawsuits have been filed throughout the federal court system, including firefighter cancer lawsuits and water contamination lawsuits being pursued against manufacturers of the firefighting foam. U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel is presiding over all pretrial proceedings in the District of South Carolina, as part of an MDL or multidistrict litigation.

field of expertise

Lawsuits And Legal Process

As the adverse health effects of the water contamination surfaced, affected individuals and families initiated legal proceedings to pursue justice and compensation for their hardships. Numerous lawsuits were filed against the U.S. government, alleging negligence, failure to provide adequate warning, and other grievances. 

Legal Process Key Steps

 The plaintiffs (those affected) engage legal representation and file lawsuits against the parties responsible for the water contamination.

Both sides gather evidence through the discovery process, which involves obtaining records, conducting depositions, and gathering experts’ opinions.hile some cases can be settled quickly, others may take longer, particularly if they require legal action.

 Depending on the strength of the evidence and negotiation process, some cases may reach an out-of-court settlement. If a settlement cannot be reached, the case proceeds to trial.

In a trial, evidence is presented, witnesses testify, and legal arguments are made. A judge or jury decides on the verdict, determining if the defendant(s) were liable and whether damages should be awarded to the plaintiffs.

If You Were A Victim Of Camp Lejeune Water Contamination, We Can Help

Have A Lawyer will match you with a qualified attorney who can evaluate your case and help you seek justice and compensation for the injuries you’ve experienced from exposure to contamination. If you believe you have a case, please contact us so we can guide you to the best possible outcome. FIND OUT NOW if you qualify for compensation. Fill out the easy form above and get an immediate and FREE case review!

Mass Tort vs. Class Action

What Are the Differences Between Mass Tort And Class Action Lawsuits?

STRUCTURE

1.Mass Tort: Consists of several individual lawsuits grouped together based on common case details or defendants.
2.Class Action Lawsuit: A single lawsuit developed for a larger group--the "class"--who are represented by a single plaintiff.

INDIVIDUAL CONTROL

1.Mass Tort: Each individual plaintiff has control over their case and its resolution.
2.Class Action Lawsuit: Members of the class have limited control over the lawsuit, as case decisions are made by the single representative plaintiff and their legal team

COMPENSATION

1.Mass Tort: Compensation and settlements are determined case by case, in consideration each plaintiff's unique circumstances and harm suffered.
2.Class Action Lawsuits: Compensation and settlements are typically distributed evenly among all class members, often based on a pro-rata structure.

APPLICABILITY

1.Mass Tort: Best for situations when each plaintiff's case is distinguished by different degrees of harm or other circumstances.
2.Class Action Lawsuits: Ideal when the members of the class all share similar claims and a uniform resolution is fair or reasonable.

EFFICIENCY

1.Mass Tort: Can be more time-consuming and complex since each case may require individual management.
2.Class Action Lawsuits: Generally more efficient as terms, negotiations, and resolutions apply more equally to all claimants.

Recognizing these distinctions is essential for both plaintiffs and defendants when deciding on the most suitable legal approach for addressing a shared complaint or injury.